that was easy

Everyone is looking for the easy button. One click. The answer appears. AI is helping that perception or expectation increase.

Many projects I do around the house. Others expect it to be easy. It never is. At the end of the project I often say, "that was easy."

In the state tax world, clients may come to you with bad facts or facts that when you apply the law produces an unfavorable or unfair result. They already got a bad answer from the state. However, they want to know if there is another way. Another argument. Another position. A sliver of hope or option that you could possibly squeeze through to get to the other side and receive a favorable result.

That favorable result could possibly be obtained if you find someone within the department of revenue, the legal division, appeals, or taxpayer advocate office that has discretion and authority to reach a different conclusion when clearly, the facts and the law when technically applied, produce an unfavorable result.

When situations like the above arise, some clients understand what they are asking you to do and are willing to pay for you to "try." Other clients may not understand what they are asking and expect there to be an "easy button" or just call the state and see what happens. That is not how a "more favorable" result will be achieved.

Now, in some cases, I do have contacts within certain state Departments of Revenue (taxation) that do offer great assistance in reaching positive resolutions in a short timeframe. However, those cases don't generally include the combination of "bad facts" and law that contradicts. Often, those cases include good facts and good law, but the taxpayer simply misapplied the law to their facts.

If you are following.

"Good facts" are facts that if the taxpayer followed the law, they would have received a reasonable result.

"Bad facts" are facts that if the taxpayer follows the law, they will not get a positive or reasonable result. Thus, we plead for mercy or discretion by a state for a fair and reasonable exception to the law as 'it is written' based on the unfair result despite the taxpayer's bad facts or misinformed guidance or reliance, etc.

QUICK QUESTION

We have all approached someone at different times and said, "we have a quick question," when we don't really know the complexity of the issue or question we are asking. Thus, we hope and expect to get an "easy" or quick response.

Other times, we ask someone a question that we know is complex and has a narrow margin of victory, yet we still expect to get an "easy" or quick response. Hmmmm.........something is wrong here.

is the law changing or simply the interpretation of the law?

Interpretation of the law determines whether there is any retroactive changes to the law being made.

If retroactively changing the law, it may be unconstitutional.

If the interpretation is simply incorrect, then no change in the law is being suggested, the interpretation is only being corrected (changed).

However, then the interpretation could be considered to being changed retroactively.

Does it matter if the law is changed or the interpretation is changed?

The answer likely depends on who is making the change.

The issues:

• What is the law?

• What is the correct interpretation of the law?

• What is the basis of that interpretation?

• Will the courts agree?

State tax laws are challenged because either the state has made an assessment and believes additional tax is due based on the state's interpretation of the law.

But what if the law is vague or ambiguous, open to interpretation?

What if the company has a different interpretation of the law?

Who wins?

Deference. What is it?

Judicial deference is the idea that under some circumstances, a court should defer to a state agency's interpretation of a statute or regulation rather than the court imposing its own interpretation.

Recently the U.S. Supreme court ruled in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo which overturned the Chevron doctrine. The Chevron doctrine gave deference to the state agency's interpretation.

From a state perspective, several states did not follow the Chevron doctrine. Some states even have anti-deference statutes.

Georgia codified antideference in 2021 specifically for tax matters providing that all quesitons of law to be decided by a court or the Georgia Tax Tribunal are to be made "without any deference to any determination or interpretation, writen or unwritten, that may have been made on the matter."

Tennessee amended its statutes effective April 2022 providing that when interpreting a state statute or rule, a court should not give deference to a state agency's interpretation and should interpret the statute "de novo."

CONCLUSION

Interpretation matters.

Public knowledge of the state's interpretation is necessary if we are to have any level of certainty and compliance.

Public knowledge of the state's interpretation allows companies to make determinations as to whether they agree with that interpretation and either accept it or challenge it.

Retroactively changing the law or the interpretation of the law can have adverse effects on not only the taxpayer involved, but the taxpayer community at large.

Ambiguity in a law creates confusion, different interpretations, risk, opportunity and ultimately, most likely, litigation.

Stay sharp. Be safe.

Don't let state taxes play the villain in your business story

Our lives are like a book. A story. A journey. Each day is a new page, a new paragraph, a new sentence, a new word. There are chapters to our lives. There is a preface, a foreword, an introduction. There are many plot lines, unexpected twists and turns. Sometimes we are the hero, sometimes we are the villian. Sometimes we know exactly what to write and other times, we just stare at the blank page. Too many options, not enough options. Do we rewrite the story? Do we turn the page? Is it time to start a new chapter or do we keep going down the same road. When good times happen, we want it to last forever. When bad things happen, we can't wait to turn the page or move into the next chapter. Sometimes we cause change and sometimes change is forced upon us. We grow, we age, we hopefully learn. We adapt, we improvise and hopefully overcome. We learn what we like, what we don't like. Our personal and professional lives intertwined. Working to focus, to achieve, to realize goals and dreams while balancing time with families and friends. Obsession leads to great things, when obsession is focused on the right things without sacrificing the most important things (which aren't things).

I'm not quite sure why I started with that intro, but hopefully it means something to you.

As business owners, business and/or tax professionals, our work takes up a lot of our time, our lives. Thus, business is personal and should be taken seriously. It is how we support ourselves and our families. It is a big part of our story. They often say that what you do is not who you are. That what you do doesn't define you. I don't think that's necessarily true. It is often difficult to separate what you do from who you are. We all take on the identity of what we do or atleast for some part of the day. Or maybe we take on an alter ego. Regardless, we have our bios that tell people some of who we are, but not the whole picture.

Right about now, you are probably asking, "how does any of this relate to state taxes?" Well, as I have done in many of my blog posts over the last decade, I will attempt to bring this back to state taxes.

Companies have a story. They have a lifecycle. They start out with an idea, a vision, a dream, a goal. Then they get capital and make investments. They pick a location, buy or build a facility, hire people, start selling, start shipping, in one state, in multiple states. Then they grow - hire more, build more, sell more. Maybe they create new legal entities, new ownership structures. Maybe they start selling different products and services. Maybe they build new facilities and hire more employees in multiple states. Maybe the entities sell to each other. Maybe the entities start selling to customers in foreign countries. Maybe they create foreign entities that sell into the U.S. Maybe they acquire another entity or they are acquired by another entity. Maybe the owners simply sell their ownership interest and move on to begin another venture.

All of the above changes, stages, activities create different state and local tax issues, risks and opportunities. Some companies plan ahead before making a decision or taking action, but often the action happens before the state tax impact is taken into consideration. This results in potential tax exposure or liabilities that arise and can grow if they are not discovered or investigated. Sometimes planning ahead could have eliminated any exposure and perhaps even created tax savings or refund opportunites. Some state tax issues related to the above are:

• knowing when to file returns in a state (i.e., having a taxable presence or nexus)

• knowing when to collect sales tax on the company's sales (sales taxability study)

• identifying tax credits and incentives related to building/investing in a specific state, county or city

• identifying any sales tax exemptions related to the company's purchases

• knowing how each type of legal entity is taxed from a state income tax perspective

• knowing the state tax impact of integrating new companies, merging companies or selling interests in a partnership or S corporation

Each stage of a company's business tells a story. Is filled with various facts, plots and challenges. State taxes play a key role and impact every chapter, every page, and perhaps every sentence. State taxes can be the hero or the villain.

Being proactive is always better than being reactive or playing the "wait and see game."

don't let uncertain state tax positions surprise your company or client

Uncertain state tax positions are everywhere. Your company or your clients likely have them. Have you identified them? Have you addressed them?

During ‘busy season’ or ‘tax season, state tax questions often arise or lay there quietly in the background while federal tax issues get all of the attention.

State tax issues or the state tax impact of an issue or transaction is generally considered after the federal tax impact is addressed.

Non-state tax experts are sometimes just too busy to give state tax issues adequate time before a deadline. In other situations, non-state tax experts may simply view a state tax issue as less complicated than it really is. Consequently, state tax issues may not get addressed before the original due date of the returns and may only get addressed in late summer or early fall prior to the extended due date. This often creates a time crunch for uncertain state tax positions to get adequately addressed. That's one of the problems.

The other problem is that most state tax issues are more complex than they appear. A high-level overview or two hours of research won't cut it, especially when you are trying to determine the state tax impact of a large transaction or adequately source the gain on a sale of a partnership interest to the right state or states.

What are these 'uncertain state tax positions'?

Where can they appear?

The following is a summary of some of the areas or items that create uncertain state tax positions on state income tax returns:

1. Structure - intangible holding companies; REIT / RIC; buy / sell companies, management / services companies; state-specific structures; captive insurance companies; finance companies; factoring companies; check-the-box entities; pass-through entities;

2. Transactions - mergers, acquisitions, divestitures; repatriation dividends; reorganizations; bankruptcy issues;

3. Nexus - P.L. 86-272; economic nexus; attribution of activities; forced combination; foreign company nexus despite no permanent establishment in U.S.;

4. Filing Options - separate, nexus combined, hybrid nexus combined, unitary combined (waters-edge, worldwide); consolidated;

5. Apportionment - ability to apportion income; choice of formula; throwback / throwout; joyce vs. finnegan; sales factor sourcing (destination, market-based sourcing, cost of performance, commercial domicile, location of payor);

6. Tax Base - business v.s nonbusiness income vs. separate accounting; Internal Revenue Code (IRC) conformity; related party addbacks; depreciation adjustments; dividends received deduction conformity; transfer pricing; foreign source income; state specific additions/subtractions;

7. Treatment of Partnerships - entity vs. aggregate theory; unitary (tax base / factor flow-up) vs non-unitary (allocation); sale of partnership interest;

8. Tax Attributes - NOLs (pre-apportioned vs. post-apportioned); IRC Sec. 382 limitations; survivor / non-survivor limitations; credits (claw-backs; compliance with agreements);

How do you ensure these items are addressed adequately?

• Get a state tax expert involved early.

How do you know when your client has any of these issues?

• Create a checklist that helps you identify clients or when your company may have these issues. That checklist may be based on the amount of sales a company has, the amount of taxable income, the number of states they file returns in (or the number of states they should file in), or if they have a specific structure or entered into a transaction that obviously needs reviewed.

There are multiple checklists you could create, the key is to make one that works for your company or firm that doesn't slow down the compliance process, but does allow you to reduce risk and adequately document a supportable, defendable or winnable position.

I hope you have a great tax season (now and in the fall). I hope all of your uncertain state tax positions achieve as much certainty as they can and are adequately addressed and documented.

conduct state tax "year-end" planning early, often & always

This is a Public Service announcement. Revealing a secret from the state and local tax underground. A secret that makes it difficult for companies to do business. To stay in compliance. To avoid compounding tax liabilities and interest and penalties.

What is this secret?

Wait for it . . . . . . . .

State taxes are a "moving target."

A "moving target" is defined as:

• something that moves while someone is trying to hit it

• something that is always changing

Some state tax rules don't change. Some state tax rules change at a certain time or in a certain tax year based on federal or state legislation. Some state tax rules change every year. Some state tax rules change suddenly based on a court case or ruling. Some state tax rules change without you knowing it based on a state's internal policy decision or change in interpretation of a statute or regulation.

• So how does a company plan?

• Conduct year-end planning?

• Conduct beginning of the year planning?

• Plan for acquisitions, mergers, divestitures?

Companies must stay on top of income tax laws on a tax year by tax year basis. Meaning, income tax laws are generally static for a specific tax year, but can change from year to year. Thus, tax pros should not follow "SALY" (same as last year) when preparing returns. This can lead to "IAP" (interest and penalties). With that said, there are situations when court case decisions or rulings happen that may have retroactive impact and create amended return / refund opportunities or may simply alter prospective returns.

In regards to sales tax, there are static rules but the interpretation of some of those static rules can change and are definitely not the same in every state. Sales tax rules and tax rates can change at different times of the year due to court cases, rulings and state legislation. Unlike income tax, sales tax periods are generally monthly, quarterly or annual

It's the lack of uniformity among state tax laws that creates risks and opportunities.

Some state income tax laws that may differ from state to state are:

• Economic Nexus (creating a taxable presence)

• Sales sourcing of sales of tangible property and services

• Requiring throwback of sales

• Allowing or requiring combined reporting

• Allowing a pass-through entity (PTE) to make a PTE tax election (i.e., $10,000 SALT-CAP work around)

• If PL 86-272 protection applies

• Conformity to federal international tax considerations (i.e., GILTI, FDII, deemed dividends, ECI, etc.)

• Treatment of bonus depreciation

• Treatment of disregarded entities (i.e., single-member LLCs or Q-Subs)

Some sales tax laws that may differ from state to state are related to the following:

• Sourcing of sales of services (including multiple points of use)

• Sourcing of sales to/from non-US countries

• Sales of software, SaaS, and other computer services

• Sales of information services or data processing

• Sales of services

• Sales by construction contractors

• Treatment of sellers in drop shipment transactions

• Allowable or acceptable forms of exemption certificates

• Treatment of leases (lessors and lessees)

• Width and breadth of manufacturing exemption

• Occasional sale or casual sale exemption when selling assets or business

• Treatment of repairs and maintenance (labor and parts)

• Treatment of research and development activities

• Sales to governmental and non-profit entities

I could keep going, but I think you get the point.

So what is a company supposed to do?

Depending on what stage your business is (i.e., start-up, emerging, growth, mature), I recommend you inquire of your tax professional about the state tax impacts of your business. You may only have one or a few states to deal with right now. Some of you may have 20 or more states to consider. The key is to get on top of it now. To know what you don't know so you can make informed decisions. To stop problems from growing out of control and implement proper procedures and tax decisions. Be proactive. Don't let blind spots create a compound effect of problems.

Conduct year-end state tax planning, early, often and always.

QUOTES

• "In all affairs, it's a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted." - Bertrand Russell

• "Bureacracy is the art of making the possible impossible." - Javier Pascual Salcedo

• "Knowledge is the beginning of practice; doing is the completion of knowing." - Wang Yangming

Are Remote Retailers and Marketplace Providers in the 'Path of Totality'?

Well, it's the day - solar eclipse day. A once in a lifetime event. Are you ready? Do you have your glasses? Will you see the total eclipse or partial eclipse?

According to the Washington Post, "the path of totality — the 70-mile-wide strip of America from Oregon to South Carolina in which the moon will, for a couple of minutes, block the sun — crosses the homes of an estimated 11 million people."

A total eclipse is something that happens once in a lifetime (if you are lucky; every 400 years or so). Well, today, our modern economy is converging with past sales tax law creating a sales tax 'eclipse' and is having difficulty figuring out how to look at it. We need the 'right glasses' to be able to tax remote retailers (online sellers) and marketplace platform providers. Amazon, since it is the largest marketplace provider I am aware of, has become the creator of this convergence, or sales tax 'eclipse.' 

We - state and federal governments, departments of revenue, taxpayers and tax professionals - must accept the fact that this sales tax 'eclipse' is happening. We must also work together to find the 'right glasses' or we will cause damage to our 'eyes' (economy and state revenue). 

Currently, states have imposed economic nexus standards and use tax notice and reporting requirements ALL with the intent to skirt the physical presence standard established by the Quill court case. The physical presence standard requires a retailer to have a physical presence standard in the state before the state can require the retailer to collect sales tax. 

I am all for states figuring out the best way to tax these remote retailer transactions; or first determining if they should tax it. I get that the states need revenue. What I disagree with is how states are going about trying to make it happen. Adopting economic nexus laws that fly in the face of Quill to simply get companies to challenge the economic nexus law is ridiculous. States want taxpayers to either comply or challenge the law, hoping the U.S. Supreme Court will take the case and overturn Quill. 

The use tax notice and reporting requirements are more burdensome and complicated than simply collecting and remitting sales tax. Again, another indirect way that states are simply trying to get companies to collect sales tax. If you can't change the law, create a law that is more complicated so companies choose the less burdensome road. I get it, but I disagree with it.

Companies want certainty. Companies don't want to focus on sales tax, they want to focus on their business. They want taxes to get out of the way or at least be something easy and clear to comply with. Companies don't want to get caught not complying and have to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties. The problem is, states are trying to force new tax collecting obligations without working together with businesses and tax professionals. They are forcing it, which is producing uncertainty and more confusion. 

State taxes already present a maze of taxing jurisdictions all competing for business and revenue with non-uniform tax laws. With this sales tax 'eclipse' staring us down, all I ask is that we work together to find the 'right glasses.' I ask the states to stop forcing damage to our eyes.